Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/09/2013 in all areas

  1. I thought we were actually having a semi intelligent conversation about the ACTUAL law itself, and not "what we think they meant". Like Neal, I like to disect a law and understand it. But oh well, we as Americans have learned to become little sheep,SHUT UP, and lay down for the government. There, I put a smiley on it to make it less whatever.
    1 point
  2. So the real question is , What exactly are we arguing for? Is it the fact that we just don't like being told that a helmet is required in a SXS or is it the law itself and the fact that the state of California requested no input from the users and OHV advocates? I didn't hear all this when a helmet was required on a 4 wheeler or a Motorcycle so I am just curious. Me personally I don't like being told what I can and can not do, but I like to drive my RZR so I will go along with it and hope that I never have a wreck to see if the law is justified.
    1 point
  3. You guys are going nowhere with this. You can try to challenge it as much as you want, but you know damn well what they mean. Who has the time and money to try and fight the wording of this law in court...on a weekday...in Barstow. Not me. Wear a helmet and shut up. Or is it that you want to install a bench seat in the back of a big bore RZR 1000? Would that even be safe?
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...