dunefreak Posted August 3, 2007 Posted August 3, 2007 I think it was yesterday when this happened. This is just horrible. My thoughts go out to the victims and their families. some videos http://youtube.com/watch?v=WOO_tCSL7Y8 http://youtube.com/watch?v=CzXNqIvTbg0 Quote
ocean's 4 Posted August 3, 2007 Posted August 3, 2007 Crazy, I heard the news saying that there is still a bunch of cars under the concrete in the water. Quote
Randog Posted August 3, 2007 Posted August 3, 2007 That's a sad situation right there. Thoughts and :praying: for them all. Quote
sand chick Posted August 3, 2007 Posted August 3, 2007 That is so sad, I feel so bad I stayed up late last night to watch the news. To make it worse they said that it had been in bad need of repair for while to. Thoughts and prayers to the families. :praying: Quote
Luvdunes Posted August 3, 2007 Posted August 3, 2007 Our thoughts and prayers go out to all the people that were involved in this horrible catastrophe and to their familes. :praying: Quote
offroadracer Posted August 3, 2007 Posted August 3, 2007 sad deal....thoughts and prayers go out to the families :praying: Quote
Bound4Dirt Posted August 3, 2007 Posted August 3, 2007 Horrible! Prayers are with the family :praying: Quote
Mr. Edgy Posted August 3, 2007 Posted August 3, 2007 That span has been labeled "structually deficient" for 17 years. I would think fixing our own infrastructure would be a whole hell of a lot more important than fixing Iraqs.....IMO Quote
Richard Cheese Posted August 3, 2007 Posted August 3, 2007 what a horrible situation i hope there is an investigation into why it was allowed to happen. Quote
lvnalolife Posted August 3, 2007 Posted August 3, 2007 It said on msnbc.com that the bridge got a poor rating on a safety inspection 2 years ago. Why was it still in use? Granted they said it was being worked on. I wonder if that is what led to its fatal destruction. Quote
dunefreak Posted August 3, 2007 Author Posted August 3, 2007 They also said questioned that bridge's design back in the SIXTIES because it's lack of supports. Quote
Mr. Edgy Posted August 3, 2007 Posted August 3, 2007 They also said questioned that bridge's design back in the SIXTIES because it's lack of supports. It was a non-redundant design...meaning if one thing goes wrong the whole structure would come down. They do not use non-redundant design anymore. Also, last year was the first time in noted history that this country spent more $'s on retrofit and rebuild than on new construction. Quote
Mr. Edgy Posted August 5, 2007 Posted August 5, 2007 Jackstands supporting a bridge in LA. At least it has redundancies. IE: Two jack stands!!!!!! Quote
offroadracer Posted August 6, 2007 Posted August 6, 2007 Jackstands supporting a bridge in LA. not good!!! and one of them looks bent Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.