RAGDOLL MX Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 http://www.dieselpowermag.com/features/071...egal/index.html Quote
dunefreak Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 why why why why why why why why????????????????????? What a waste of work. Yeah it's different, but you can make more power with the factory turbo charged 3.8L. You can get that car in the 9's or even 8's with the factory motor done up. And did you see they used an LB7?? (early DMax motor) :mc_smiley: At least use an LLY or LBZ DMax. That thing is only running 12's after all that work. wow. This does look badass though with black smoke .... http://images.dieselpowermag.com/features/...ying_rubber.jpg Quote
dunefreak Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 I wanna hear what 1320 has to say about this. He used to be a Grand National nut. :mc_smiley: Quote
RAGDOLL MX Posted December 6, 2007 Author Posted December 6, 2007 it may run in the 12's but i bet it can pull your toy hauler... Quote
ltr450rider Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 It's all being different people. :mc_smiley: That thing is cool. I wonder if I'll see him in my area. Those pics were taken at Santa Fe damn and Irwindale is only 20 min away by side streets. I wanna check that thing out. Quote
dunefreak Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 it may run in the 12's but i bet it can pull your toy hauler... no....I don't think so. :mc_smiley: Quote
SandBox_Kid Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 it may run in the 12's but i bet it can pull your toy hauler... :mc_smiley: It may have a chance of getting it rolling, but could you imagine trying to stop that bad boy!! Quote
Richard Cheese Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 Then disaster struck. On the way home, the Regal's gas engine sprang a fuel leak, and the entire car burned to the ground. um thats the first clue god didnt want you do do it :mc_smiley: Quote
dunefreak Posted December 6, 2007 Posted December 6, 2007 It may have a chance of getting it rolling, but could you imagine trying to stop that bad boy!! I doubt it. The tires would go flat and it might pop a wheelie before it even gets moving. That's if you could even get a hitch put on that car that's big enough. :mc_smiley: Quote
barefoot bob Posted December 7, 2007 Posted December 7, 2007 waste of money like pete said that turbo 6 was a mustang killer for way less Quote
RAGDOLL MX Posted December 8, 2007 Author Posted December 8, 2007 but if your read the article...it was actually a regal, with all the GNX badging, so it had a V6 non turbo'd motor, it was a granny/beaner car to beging with, so this guy probably had money and a diesel motor just sittin around... Quote
powerhouse Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 but if your read the article...it was actually a regal, with all the GNX badging, so it had a V6 non turbo'd motor, it was a granny/beaner car to beging with, so this guy probably had money and a diesel motor just sittin around... it was a diesel ! Quote
CaptNkllm Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 (edited) http://mcratracing.com/k/kat1059.wmv thats what he should have wasted his money on there!!! My kind of truck lol hahaah gotta luv the lly LBZ SUKS!! Capt Edited December 8, 2007 by CaptNkllm Quote
powerhouse Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 http://mcratracing.com/k/kat1059.wmv thats what he should have wasted his money on there!!! My kind of truck lol hahaah gotta luv the lly LBZ SUKS!! Capt YEAH BABY !! that's a eefing truck ... Quote
sanddunesaddict Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 http://mcratracing.com/k/kat1059.wmv thats what he should have wasted his money on there!!! My kind of truck lol hahaah gotta luv the lly LBZ SUKS!! Capt I think you are backwards the LBZ is better then the LLY Quote
CaptNkllm Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 (edited) I think you are backwards the LBZ is better then the LLY Not yet it isnt..... so far they have made more consistant power with the lly. Unless you have some info to share ? Capt here ya go show me an lbz that can do that and your in business Edited December 8, 2007 by CaptNkllm Quote
ntrsandman Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 (edited) That dude has ( $$$$$ ) Edited December 8, 2007 by ntrsandman Quote
ltr450rider Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 but if your read the article...it was actually a regal, with all the GNX badging, so it had a V6 non turbo'd motor, it was a granny/beaner car to beging with, so this guy probably had money and a diesel motor just sittin around... Am I the only one that caught that. You got some there man! Quote
dunefreak Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 http://mcratracing.com/k/kat1059.wmv thats what he should have wasted his money on there!!! My kind of truck lol hahaah gotta luv the lly LBZ SUKS!! Capt LBZ's are more powerful and quieter than an LLY. I have an LLY and I know. Not yet it isnt..... so far they have made more consistant power with the lly. Unless you have some info to share ? Capt here ya go show me an lbz that can do that and your in business :eatdrink021: Why would you even post THAT? While your at it David, you might as well start arguing about which is capable of being faster- Banshees or 450's. Quote
wingnut Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 5.9 Cummins are more badass then a LBZ, LLY.........ABC, 123 XYZ Quote
powerhouse Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 5.9 Cummins are more badass then a LBZ, LLY.........ABC, 123 XYZ I have been waiting for you to say something on this , Cheese Nuts !! Quote
CaptNkllm Posted December 8, 2007 Posted December 8, 2007 LBZ's are more powerful and quieter than an LLY. I have an LLY and I know. Why would you even post THAT? While your at it David, you might as well start arguing about which is capable of being faster- Banshees or 450's. Problem with the lbz is that (correct me if i am wrong) big power parts are not available yet to produce some big winners yet (could be wrong but i have only seen lly so far)(there are exceptions but i havnt seen any yet) right on about the noise level for sure. I think the problem with the lbz is the platform gm used on the software is different then than what was used on the lb? 1st dmax and the lly... so thwey have been working on getting all of that figured out. So in turn they havnt produced the top dogs in that catagory (yet). I agree it is not as noisy and it produces more hp and TQ of the floor but they havnt advanced real far on these as compaired to the lly (compairing the 2) Now about that 450 vs banshee's we we all know that they are not even in the same class as a 700r so why bring that up Pete? Always trying to start something arnt you!! Capt Quote
dunefreak Posted December 9, 2007 Posted December 9, 2007 Problem with the lbz is that (correct me if i am wrong) big power parts are not available yet to produce some big winners yet (could be wrong but i have only seen lly so far)(there are exceptions but i havnt seen any yet) right on about the noise level for sure. I think the problem with the lbz is the platform gm used on the software is different then than what was used on the lb? 1st dmax and the lly... so thwey have been working on getting all of that figured out. So in turn they havnt produced the top dogs in that catagory (yet). I agree it is not as noisy and it produces more hp and TQ of the floor but they havnt advanced real far on these as compaired to the lly (compairing the 2) Now about that 450 vs banshee's we we all know that they are not even in the same class as a 700r so why bring that up Pete? Always trying to start something arnt you!! Capt Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.